Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX · CBSA 13140
Civil Engineer Salary in Beaumont
VerifiedPublished metro-area wages for civil engineers in Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX, from the BLS OEWS May 2024 release — with the local distribution set against Texas and the national benchmark.
Civil Engineers in Beaumont earn a median of $93,580 per year, per BLS OEWS May 2024. The middle 50% earn $73,200–$126,610; the top 10% earn $158,910. That is 6% below the national median and 2% below the Texas median. BLS reports 610 employed locally.
Median wage
Verified$93,580
-6% vs national
Top 10% earn
$158,910
90th percentile
Employed in metro
610
Reliability Good (5.8% RSE)
Civil Engineer pay — Beaumont vs Texas vs national
All three distributions are published BLS percentiles on a single shared scale.
| Percentile | Annual wage | vs national |
|---|---|---|
| 10th percentileentry / low | $61,490 | -7% |
| 25th percentile | $73,200 | -7% |
| Median50th percentile | $93,580 | -6% |
| 75th percentile | $126,610 | -1% |
| 90th percentiletop earners | $158,910 | -1% |
| Meanaverage | $104,470 | -2% |
How concentrated civil engineers are in Beaumont
Location quotient compares local concentration to the national rate. Above 1.00 means this metro employs the occupation more densely than the country overall.
Location quotient
1.65
Jobs per 1,000
3.81
Metro rank (pay)
#197 of 373
All engineering roles
$116,419
At a location quotient of 1.65, Beaumont is a genuine hub for this discipline — the occupation is roughly 1.6× as concentrated here as nationally, which usually means deeper employer competition and more lateral options.
Frequently asked questions
How much does a civil engineer make in Beaumont?
Does Beaumont pay more than the rest of Texas?
Where does Beaumont rank nationally for civil engineers?
Source details
Published wage from BLS OEWS May 2024 for SOC 17-2051 (Civil Engineers), Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX (metro area).
Benchmarks come from published government wage data via BLS OEWS. Local and emerging-role figures are labeled estimates. Full methodology →